Index of Opinions Issued by LSBEP
(click on the number to read the opinion)

No. Title Date Issued/Amended

001

Psychopharmacology Assessment and/or Consultation

7/30/99

002

Clinical/Counseling Experience

9/24/99 (rev. 7/16/04)

003

Broadcast Assessment and/or Intervention

2/4/00

004

Continuing Education Clarification on Graduate Courses (8/18/00)

Amended 5/4/01; Amended 4/29/05; Repealed 2/10/06

005

Advertisement

12/8/00

006

Records Retention

3/9/01

007

Date of Doctoral Degree

3/9/01

008

Supervision of Unlicensed Assistants

3/9/01

009

Presenters of Educational Services on Psychological Topics

12/7/01

010

Qualifications of a Supervising Psychologist

6/14/02

011

Psychologists Ordering Medical Tests

3/14/03 (rev. 9/10/04)

 

Opinion 001: Psychopharmacology Assessment and/or Consultation July 30, 1999

It is the opinion of the Louisiana State Board of Examiners of Psychologists that it is within the scope of practice of psychology to gain competence in the field of psychopharmacology.  Psychologists who gain competence in psychopharmacology may provide consultation to professionals regarding psychotropic medications.

back to TOP

Opinion 002: Clinical/Counseling Experience September 24, 1999 (rev. July 16, 2004)

Professional activities having a requisite number of years of clinical or counseling experience may include activities performed with the designated specialties of clinical, counseling, school, or clinical neuropsychology, however, such requisite experience shall not include internship or any other experience or activities prior to licensure.

back to TOP

Opinion 003:  Broadcast Assessment and/or Intervention February 4, 2000

It is the opinion of the Louisiana State Board of Examiners of Psychologists that although the topic of Media Presentations is addressed in Standard 3.04 Media Presentations further clarification of this area of practice is needed due to the potential for harm to the public as this practice area expands.  According to Standard 3.04:

When psychologists provide advice or comment by means of public lectures, demonstrations, radio or television programs, prerecorded tapes, printed articles, mailed material, or other media, they take reasonable precautions to ensure that (1) the statements are based on appropriate psychological literature and practice, (2) the statements are otherwise consistent with this Ethics Code, and (3) the recipients of this information are not encouraged to infer that a relationship has been established with them personally.

Background 

It is clear that media activity is not per se unethical.  However, psychologists who practice in this area need to be especially careful regarding potential violation of Ethical Principles 1.03 (Professional and Scientific Relationships) and 1.19 (Exploitive Relationships).  Entertainment is frequently the foremost purpose of broadcast mental health presentations but the mental health professional must never allow entertainment considerations to outweigh or dilute the principles of ethical mental health practice.  Data are not readily available on the effects of media psychology on the consumer.

Suggestions for Ethical Media Practice

Those who enter this practice area are advised to be aware of ethical considerations, the rules of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), and suggestions for ethical practice which have been developed by the Association for Media Psychology.  Special attention should be paid to Ethical Principle 1.19a (Exploitative Relationships).

If participating in a call-in format, the psychologist should assure that all calls are screened off air and such screening procedures be developed by the psychologist rather than the show’s producer.  Whoever is responsible for such screening should receive sufficient training, analogous to that provided to crisis line workers, so that immediate referral to appropriate community resources is made for those callers who need such assistance.

Disclaimers should be developed for media shows.  These disclaimers should include the fact that the presentation is not considered to provide a therapeutic relationship and that some individuals may be placed on hold for a period of time prior to being heard.  Note should also be made that some callers may be referred for individual professional assistance rather than being heard “on air.”

Media professionals need to be aware of those areas of concern which are most likely to arise in this setting and to be aware of their limitations of knowledge in those areas.  Typical areas of concern are marriage issues, child care and discipline, various forms of emotional distress, issues of sexuality including contraception, addictions, and career issues.  There is also a special need to be aware of cultural, ethnic, and special interest group differences which may impact responses but that such group membership may not be obvious in a call-in format.

Given the limited contact with the person available in call-in format media work, psychologists should avoid making suggestions for major life changes, criticism of reported prior forms of intervention, specific diagnosis of problems.  In order to make the limitations of such presentations clear, a standard disclaimer should be developed and aired repeatedly on the program.

If asked to serve as a guest on a talk show, psychologists should be clear about their role.  It is best to view the show before agreeing to participate.  If the psychologist finds that the show exploits guests this may be a situation in which the psychologist may be in a position to influence the show’s producers by explaining the parts of the Ethics Code which led the psychologist to decline the offer.

Because this practice area is relatively new, this is also an area where peer consultation should be used in any case in which the psychologist has questions about the ethics of the situation. 

back to TOP

Opinion 004: Continuing Education Clarification on Graduate Courses August 18, 2000, Amended 5/04/01 Amended 4/29/05 Repealed 2/10/06

It is the opinion of the LSBEP that completing a graduate course is acceptable for continuing education (CE) credit. The number of hours of CE allowed in this case is calculated at a ratio of 10:1 (10 hours CE credit = 1 hour course credit).

Continuing Education credit will be acceptable for graduate courses if they meet the criteria of 803.D.1 & 2 and 805.A.

back to TOP

Opinion 005: Advertisement December 8, 2000

It is the opinion of the LSBEP that advertisement is defined as any form of public dissemination of information, announcement, or listing of services of a psychological nature as defined in the practice of psychology, including but not limited to radio, television, newspaper, magazine, telemarketing, internet, webpage, business card, stationery, flyer or brochure, telephone, yellow pages, outdoor advertising including business signs, building directories, billboards, etc. 

It shall be considered a violation of §709 Conduct of Supervision for any supervising psychologist to promote the services of any supervisee via advertisement of any nature.  Violators will be subject to disciplinary action such as suspension. 

No psychologist shall advertise services for which he is not trained or certified to perform as documented by transcript of coursework or approved continuing education.

back to TOP

Opinion 006: Records Retention March 9, 2001

In light of the absence of a generally accepted standard or rule for the retention of patient records, the Louisiana State Board of Examiners of Psychologists establishes the following Opinion which includes reference to the State of Louisiana RS 40:1299.96 (Supp. 1992), pertaining to health care information records and is in accord with this statute as it applies to a “health care provider” which is defined as a “person, corporation, facility or institution licensed by this state to provide health care or professional services as physician, hospital, dentist, registered or licensed practical nurse, pharmacist, optometrist, podiatrist, chiropractor, physical therapist, or psychologist, or an officer, employer, or agent thereof.” (RS 40:1299.41)

Records of patients who were of their majority (generally considered eighteen years of age in the State of Louisiana) at the time the psychologist provided services shall be maintained in the original, microfilmed, or similarly reproduced form for a minimum of six years past the termination date a patient was seen by the psychologist.  Records of minors should be kept at least three years past the age of majority.  If the patient was seen in an institution it is the responsibility of the institution to maintain the records.

Individual circumstances and the discretion of the psychologist may warrant retention beyond these times.  Retention of financial records pertaining to patients may fall under other state or federal standards and the psychologist may wish to consult a certified professional accountant, attorney or other financial expert.  The psychologist should be acquainted with the Ethical Standards related to the preserving of records and data (LAC, Chapter 13, Ethical Principle 5.09) as well as other Louisiana laws related to this issue.

back to TOP

Opinion 007: Date of Doctoral Degree March 9, 2001

RS 37:2356.A.4 requires an applicant for licensure in Louisiana to hold a doctoral degree with a major in psychology from a school or college as defined in that same chapter. 

It is the Opinion of the Board of Examiners of Psychologists that the date an applicant actually “holds” their degree is the date which is reflected on their transcript from the school or college from which the degree was obtained.

back to TOP

Opinion 008: Supervision of Unlicensed Assistants March 9, 2001

The Board eliminated the procedure of registering unlicensed assistants commencing July 1, 1998.  This was not set forth to be considered as ongoing policy, which would not change according to trends regarding the functions of the unlicensed assistant or the supervisor. 

The Opinion of the Board is that the supervisor shall make arrangements for supervision in his or her absence.  In the case of prolonged illness or absence, the supervisor should designate another licensed psychologist to perform as full supervisor with all of the responsibilities of the original supervisor.  In like manner, this means that the legal and professional responsibility for the welfare of all clients would be transferred to the  temporary supervisor.  Therefore, the same responsiblity of “functional authority” over the psychological services, which are provided by the unlicensed assistant, would be legally and professionally expected of the temporary supervisor.  The Opinion of the Board is that the Board would not need to be notified of this temporary change of supervisor.

back to TOP

Opinion 009: Presenters of Educational Services on Psychological Topics December 7, 2001

It is the sense of the Louisiana State Board of Examiners of Psychologists that a person does not need to be licensed as a psychologist in this state in order to provide educational programs here on psychological topics.  However, in order to present him(her)self as a psychologist in this state in the course of presenting an educational program, the person must either be 1) licensed in Louisiana, 2) licensed in another jurisdiction, 3) a psychology faculty member at a university, or 4) an acceptable sponsor of continuing education as defined by LA Statute 805.

This statement assumes that the program is educational and not therapeutic.  A license to practice psychology in Louisiana or supervision by or association with a Louisiana psychologist would be required to conduct a therapeutic program in this state that is either labeled as being “psychological” or in which the person conducting it presents him(her)self as a psychologist.

back to TOP

Opinion 010: Qualifications of a Supervising Psychologist June 14, 2002

It is the opinion of the Louisiana State Board of Examiners of Psychologists (LSBEP) that in order to meet the supervisor duties and qualifications described in Sections 701 and 705 of the Louisiana Administrative Code, Title 46, Part LXIII, typically the supervising psychologist shall have been licensed for a minimum of one year and supervise no more than two candidates for licensure at the same time.  On a case-by-case basis, at the discretion of the LSBEP, exceptions to these requirements may be granted.  The LSBEP retains the right to approve or deny any supervisory relationship

back to TOP

Opinion 011: Psychologist Ordering Medical Tests March 14, 2003 Revised 9/10/2004

Except for Medical Psychologists practicing under the provisions of R.S. 37:2371-2378, it is generally advisable for psychologists to avoid ordering medical tests. This is particularly true if the psychologist is considered the primary caregiver. If the psychologist is the primary caregiver and has reason to believe there is physical pathology, referral to a physician is generally the appropriate course of action.

back to TOP

 

This site created and maintained by Onesimus Internet Solutions, Inc.