Note:
Changes in
the laws, rules and regulations since the 2001 edition of the LSBEP
Directory and Statutory Reference book appear in boldface type in this
2002 edition.
Insanity Proceedings,
La. Code of Crim. Proc., Art. 641-653 (Supp. 1992)
Art. 641. Mental incapacity to proceed defined
Mental incapacity to proceed exists when, as a
result of mental disease or defect, a defendant presently lacks the
capacity to understand the proceedings against him or to assist in his
defense.
Art. 642. How mental incapacity is raised; effect
The defendant’s mental incapacity to proceed may
be raised at any time by the defense, the district attorney, or the court.
When the question of the defendant’s mental incapacity to proceed is
raised, there shall be no further steps in the criminal prosecution,
except the institution of prosecution, until the defendant is found to
have the mental capacity to proceed.
Art. 643. Order for mental examination
The court shall order a mental examination of the
defendant when it has reasonable ground to doubt the defendant’s mental
capacity to proceed. Prior to the ordering of any such mental examination,
the court shall appoint counsel to represent the defendant if he has not
already retained counsel.
Art. 644. Appointment of sanity commission; examination
of defendant
A. Within seven days after a mental examination is
ordered, the court shall appoint a sanity commission to examine and report
upon the mental condition of the defendant.
The sanity commission shall consist of at least two and not more than
three physicians who are licensed to practice medicine in Louisiana, who
have been in the actual practice of medicine for not less than three
consecutive years immediately preceding the appointment, and who are
qualified by training or experience in forensic evaluations. No more than
one member of the commission shall be the coroner or any one of his
deputies. The court may appoint, in lieu of one physician, a psychologist
who is licensed to practice psychology in Louisiana, who has been engaged
in the practice of clinical or counseling psychology for not less than
three consecutive years immediately preceding the appointment, and who is
qualified by training or experience in forensic evaluations.
B. The physicians appointed to make the
examination shall have free access to the defendant at all reasonable
times. The court shall subpoena witnesses to attend the examination at the
request of the defendant, the commission, or any member thereof.
C. For the purpose of the mental examination, the
court may order a defendant previously released on bail to appear for
mental examinations and hearings in the same manner as other criminal
proceedings. Amended by ,Acts 1975, No. 325, § 1;
Acts 1987, No. 577, § 1; ,Acts 1990, No. 488, §1.
Art. 645. Report of sanity commission
A (1) The report of the sanity commission
members shall address their specific findings with regard to all of the
following:
(a) The defendant’s capacity to
understand the proceedings against him. (b) His
ability to assist in his defense.
(c) His need for inpatient
hospitalization in the event he is found incompetent.
(2) The fact that the defendant claims to
be unable to remember the time period surrounding the alleged offense
shall not, by itself, bar a finding of competency if the defendant
otherwise understands the charges against him and can assist in his
defense.
B. The report of the sanity commission shall be
filed in triplicate with the presiding judge within thirty days after the
date of the order of appointment. The time for filing may be extended by
the court. The clerk shall make copies of the report available to the
district attorney and to the defendant or his counsel without cost.
Amended by Acts 1990, No. 436, § 1.
Art. 647. Determination of mental capacity to proceed
The issue of the defendant’s mental capacity to
proceed shall be determined by the court in a contradictory hearing. The
report of the sanity commission is admissible in evidence at the hearing,
and members of the sanity commission may be called as witnesses by the
court, the defense, or the district attorney. Regardless of who calls them
as witnesses, the members of the commission are subject to
cross-examination by the defense, by the district attorney, and by the
court. Other evidence pertaining to the defendant’s mental capacity to
proceed may be introduced at the hearing by the defense and by the
district attorney.
Art. 648. Procedure after determination of mental
capacity or incapacity
A. The criminal prosecution shall be resumed
unless the court determines by clear and convincing evidence that the
defendant does not have the mental capacity to proceed. If the court
determines that the defendant lacks mental capacity to proceed, the
proceedings shall be suspended and one of the following dispositions made:
(1) If the court determines that the
defendant’s mental capacity is likely to be restored within ninety days by
outpatient care and treatment at an institution as defined by R.S.
28:2(28) while remaining in the custody of the criminal authorities, and
if the person is not charged with a felony or a misdemeanor classified as
an offense against the person and is considered by the court to be
unlikely to commit crimes of violence, then the court may order outpatient
care and treatment at any institution as defined by R.S. 28:2(28).
(2) If the person is charged with a felony
or a misdemeanor classified as an offense against the person and
considered by the court to be likely to commit crimes of violence, and if,
the court determines that his mental capacity is likely to be restored
within ninety days as a result of treatment, the court may order immediate
jail-based treatment by the Department of Health and Hospitals not to
exceed ninety days; otherwise, if his capacity cannot be restored within
ninety days and impatient treatment is recommended, the court shall commit
the defendant to the Feliciana Forensic Facility.
B. (1) In no instance shall such custody, care,
and treatment exceed the time of the maximum sentence the defendant could
receive if convicted of the crime with which he is charged. At any time
after commitment and on the recommendation of the superintendent of the
institution that the defendant will not attain the capacity to proceed
with his trial in the foreseeable future, the court shall, within a
reasonable time and after at least then days notice to the district
attorney and defendant’s counsel, conduct a contradictory hearing to
determine whether the mentally defective defendant is, and will in the
foreseeable future be, incapable of standing trial and whether he is a
danger to himself or others.
(2) If, after the hearing, the court
determines the defendant is, and will in the foreseeable future be,
incapable of standing trial and may be released without danger to himself
or others, the court shall release the defendant on probation. The
probationer shall be under the supervision of the Department of Public
Safety and Corrections, division of probation and parole, and subject to
such conditions as may be imposed by the court.
(3) If, after the hearing, the court
determines the mentally defective defendant incapable of standing trial,
is a danger to himself or others, and is unlikely in the foreseeable
future to be capable of standing trial, the court shall order commitment
to a designated and medically suitable treatment facility. Such a judgment
shall constitute an order of civil commitment. However, the director of
the institution designated for the patient’s treatment shall, in writing,
notify the court and the district attorney when the patient is to be
discharged or conditionally discharged.
C. The superintendent of the forensic unit of the
Feliciana Forensic Facility shall admit only those persons charged with a
felony or a misdemeanor classified as an offense against the person and
committed on recommendation of a sanity commission, persons charged with a
felony or a misdemeanor classified as an offense against the person and
found not guilty by reason of insanity, and persons transferred to the
forensic unit from state correctional institutions.
Amended by Acts 1975, No. 325, § 1; Acts 1979, No. 318, §
1; Acts 1980, No. 612, § 1; Acts 1982, No. 495, § 1; Acts 1983, No. 399, §
1; Acts 1987, No. 928, §
1, eff. July 20, 1987; Acts 1988, No. 383, § 1; Acts 1990, No. 755, § 1.
Art. 648.1 Information required prior to admission
No superintendent of an institution shall admit a
defendant found by the court to lack the mental capacity to proceed
pursuant to Art. 648 unless he is furnished by the court the following
information:
(1) The name and address of the defendant’s
attorney.
(2) The crime or crimes with which the
defendant is charged and the date of such charge or charges.
(3) A copy of the report of the sanity
commission.
(4) Any other pertinent information
concerning the defendant’s health which has come to the attention of the
court such as injuries sustained at the time of arrest or injuries
sustained following incarceration.
(5) A copy of the defendant’s criminal
history record.
(6) A copy of the police report concerning
the charged offense. Added by Acts 1975, No. 325,
§ 2. Amended by Acts 1990, No. 754, § 1.
Art. 650. Mental examination after plea of insanity
When a defendant enters a combined plea of “not
guilty and not guilty by reason of insanity,” the court may appoint a
sanity commission as provided in Article 644 to make an examination as to
the defendant’s mental condition at the time of the offense. The court may
also order the commission to make an examination as to the defendant’s
present mental capacity to proceed. Mental examinations and reports under
this article shall be conducted and filed in conformity with Articles 644
through 646.
Art. 653. Testimony of members of sanity commission
Upon
the trial of the defense of insanity at the time of the offense, the
members of the sanity commission may be called as witnesses by the court,
the defense, or the district attorney. Regardless of who calls them as
witnesses, the members of the commission are subject to cross-examination
by the defense, by the district attorney, and by the court. Other evidence
pertaining to the defense of insanity at time of the offense may be
introduced at the trial by the defense and by the district attorney.